There are at least 67 different uniformitarian the present is the key to the past methods of dating the earth other than long-age radiometric dating: each of which yield ages of less than million years. These same people say that science is important. What is less commonly known are any of the details of how the issue was settled: such as that the 4. There are many ways to keep track of time, the most reliable of which is to use actual records such as counting hours, days, weeks, and years. In many cases it is quite difficult to prove whether one method is superior to another: and in this regard, the only way of doing so is to closely examine how each method works and try to find fault with it. In regard to the radiometric dating of rocks, it is known that various different radiometric methods often yield quite discordant dates for the same rock, thus proving that they cannot all be correct. In this regard, pro-evolution scientists are very selective about which dates they accept and which ones they reject: such as any date that is contrary to the Geological Time Chart - to which all radiometric dates must fall in line with.
Therefore, evidence of differing carbon concentrations i. We now will look to see if there is just such evidence.
Radiometric dating dinosaurs
A frozen musk ox found at Fairbanks Creek, Alaska, had scalp muscle tissue 24, years old and hair 17, years old according to carbon dating. At least three other frozen animals, two mammoths and a mastodon, have been found with parts of their bodies with carbon ages far different from other parts or from surrounding plant life that perished with or shortly after the animals.
If the conventionally accepted age of dinosaurs is wrong, then what about other conventionally accepted dates? Other dates are thrown into question.
Radiocarbon dating just helps us zero in on a more precise estimate. In the case of dinosaur fossils, Hugh Miller and his group of creationists claim to have obtained radiocarbon dates on endogenous sources of carbon But regarding the source of the radiocarbon signal detected, all they have are unverified claims. Nothing more. Jun 17, Uranium-Lead (U-Pb) dating is the go-to method for dinosaur age samples, being able to accurately date rocks (yes, rocks, we'll come to that later) between 1 million and billion years old 3. Two decay chains are measured in this type of radiometric dating, U > Pb and U > Pb, via a cascade of alpha and beta decay with. Feb 07, Radiometric Dating of Recent Dinosaur Bones-Censored. It now appears obvious that both kinds of animals [dinosaurs and pterosaurs] lived together much more recently, although two supposedly scientific authorities have censored this discovery, in my opinion, preventing public viewing. Decide for yourself if this is a case of censorship.
This implies there may be less certainty about the time frame during which species supposedly evolved. One point that is worth noticing is that these dinosaur ages are all much younger than the conventional ones. This implies there was less time for evolution to occur.
Are radiometric dating dinosaurs speaking
Even with the accepted millions and millions of years for evolution to supposedly have brought mammals into existence from their precursors, evolution still has many problems. Shortening the time available just makes evolution even more unlikely.
Evolutionists have said the following. Co-occurrence of men and dinosaurs.
Such an association would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity. The entire history of creation, including the day of rest, could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the Genesis myth.
Consider, that radiometric dating dinosaurs reply
Evolution would be vanquished. There is an infinite variety of ways in which, sincethe general concept of evolution might have been demolished.
Dr. Kent Hovind - Carbon Dating Dinosaur Bones. 7-7-17
The unequivocal discovery of a fossil population of horses in Precambrian rocks would disprove evolution. More generally, any topsy-turvy sequence of fossils would force us to rethink our theory, yet not a single one has come to light.
As Darwin recognized, a single geographic inconsistency would have nearly the same power of destruction.
Opinion very radiometric dating dinosaurs opinion you are
The evidence strongly hints that evolution is, at best, not on as firm a foundation as many have claimed. Do we look at the evidence and let it speak, or do we deny the evidence because of our biases?
The Bible and Radiometric dating (The Problem with Carbon 14 and other dating methods). Many people are under the false impression that carbon dating proves that dinosaurs and other extinct animals lived millions of years ago. What many do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. Apr 27, There are at least 67 different uniformitarian (the present is the key to the past) methods of dating the earth other than long-age radiometric dating: each of which yield ages of less than million years. 1 Of these other methods, 44 yield maximum ages of less than one million years and 23 others yield (max) ages of one million to million years.1 Yet all these other science-based. Radiometric dating dinosaurs Carbon 14 and most widely known form of the initial condition assumption for potassium dating dinosaur fossils Full Report , absolute ages. Their emails. What many people are through your article concerning the amount .
This is the choice we face when confronted with evidence such as presented in this article. Science is theories built on evidence; evidence built on theories i.
Skip to main content. Search form Search this site. November, Joe Spears MS. Dinosaurs supposedly died out 65 million years ago.
An apatosaurus was found in late Jurassic strata of the Morrison formation, and excavation was done in and In a triceratops horn was found. A femur bone from a hardosaur in was found in the Hell Creek formation.
Consider, that radiometric dating dinosaurs can recommend
An acrocanthosaurus carnivorous dinosaur specimen was excavated in near Glen Rose, Texas and was tested in by the University of Georgia. Special care was taken to prevent this kind of contamination. Bones were cleaned by ultrasonics. Then the bone was crushed and acetic acid was applied to remove any possible external contamination carbonates.
Hydrochloric acid was added to dissolve the bone and release carbon dioxide, which was then chemically treated to produce graphite. This graphite was then tested for carbon Other evidence indicating younger ages for fossils These findings about dinosaur fossils are just a piece of the evidence indicating assumed ages are perhaps mistaken. Carbon in diamonds Diamonds supposedly formed even further back in the past than dinosaurs -over a billion years ago.
Stanley, Johns Hopkins University: There is an infinite variety of ways in which, sincethe general concept of evolution might have been demolished.
You will see presentation 5 is missing between 4 and 6.
Notice the titles of 4 and 6 correspond in both lists, which in the opinion of some, hints strongly that the list with number 5 present was an original list. Caron dated dinosaur bones - under 40, years old.
Radiocarbon in diamonds: enemy of billions of years. Brown RH The interpretation of C dates.
Third, many dating methods that don't involve radioisotopes-such as helium diffusion, erosion, magnetic field decay, and original tissue fossils-conflict with radioisotope ages by showing much younger apparent ages. These observations give us confidence that radiometric dating is not trustworthy. Jan 15, The most widely known form of radiometric dating is carbon multicoingames.com is what archaeologists use to determine the age of human-made artifacts. But carbon dating won't work on dinosaur bones. The half-life of carbon is only 5, years, so carbon dating is only effective on samples that are less than 50, years multicoingames.com: Tracy V. Wilson. Dec 30, The most widely known form of radiometric dating is carbon dating. This is what archaeologists use to determine the age of human-made artifacts. But carbon dating won't work on dinosaur bones. The half-life of carbon is only 5, years, so carbon dating is only effective on samples that are less than 50, years old.
Brown W How accurate is radiocarbon dating? Brown W The origin of Earth's radioactivity. TASC Meeting. The body of a seal that had been dead for 30 years was carbon dated, and the results stated that the seal had died 4, years ago! What about a freshly killed seal? Well, they dated one of those too, the results stated that the seal had died 1, years ago.
Antarctic Journal vol. Consequently organisms living there dated by C14 give ages much older than their true age.
A lake Bonney seal known to have died only a few weeks before was carbon dated. The results stated that the seal had died between and years ago. Antarctic Journal, Washington.
Shells from living snails were dated using the Carbon 14 method.