Please, christian response to carbon dating consider, that you

opinion you are

See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish. P eople who ask about carbon 14 C dating usually want to know about the radiometric [1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years-carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering -the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days? Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. He said,.

I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.

apologise, but

If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write. I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ. The lecturer talked at length about how inaccurate C14 Dating is as 'corrected' by dendrochronology.

The methodology is quite accurate, but dendrochronology supposedly shows that the C14 dates go off because of changes in the equilibrium over time, and that the older the dates the larger the error. Despite this she continually uses the c14 dates to create 'absolute' chronologies. She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.

They conveniently forget to mention that the tree ring chronology was arranged by C14 dating. The scientists who were trying to build the chronology found the tree rings so ambiguous that they could not decide which rings matched which using the bristlecone pine. So they tested some of the ring sequences by C14 to put the sequences in the 'right' order.

A Christian response to radiometric dating Published: 21 September (GMT+10) Image multicoingames.com For more than ten years now a paper by Roger Wiens entitled 'Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective' has been saying that radio-isotopic dating is absolutely reliable and the earth is definitely millions of years old. Wiens, a physicist. Whenever the worldview of evolution is questioned, the topic of carbon dating always comes up. Here is how carbon dating works and the assumptions it is based upon. How Carbon Dating Works Radiation from the sun strikes the atmosphere of the earth all day long. This energy converts about 21 pounds of nitrogen into radioactive carbon Question: What about radiocarbon dating? Is it accurate? Response: I asked several people who know about this field. Their responses are numbered below. (1.) C14 dating is very accurate for wood used up to about 4, years ago. This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age.

Once they did that they developed the overall sequence. And this big sequence is then used to 'correct' C14 dates. Talk of circular reasoning!!!! Even if the rate of decay is constant, without a knowledge of the exact ratio of C12 to C14 in the initial sample, the dating technique is still subject to question. Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay. This skews the 'real' answer to a much younger age.

Is Carbon Dating Reliable? Is it accurate?

amusing question Yes

Home What's New and So data are again selected according to what the researcher already believes about the age of the rock. Geologist Dr. Steve Austin sampled basalt from the base of the Grand Canyon strata and from the lava that spilled over the edge of the canyon. By evolutionary reckoning, the latter should be a billion years younger than the basalt from the bottom. Standard laboratories analyzed the isotopes. The rubidium-strontium isochron technique suggested that the recent lava flow was Ma older than the basalts beneath the Grand Canyon-an impossibility.

If the dating methods are an objective and reliable means of determining ages, they should agree. If a chemist were measuring the sugar content of blood, all valid methods for the determination would give the same answer within the limits of experimental error. However, with radiometric dating, the different techniques often give quite different results.

In the study of the Grand Canyon rocks by Austin, different techniques gave different results. Techniques that give results that can be dismissed just because they don't agree with what we already believe cannot be considered objective.

business your

In Australia, some wood found the Tertiary basalt was clearly buried in the lava flow that formed the basalt, as can be seen from the charring. Isotope ratios or uraninite crystals from the Koongarra uranium body in the Northern Territory of Australia gave lead-lead isochron ages of Ma, plus or minus Ma.

discuss the degree to which the various dating systems agree with each other. The goal is to promote greater understanding on this issue, particularly for the Christian community. Many people have been led to be skeptical of dating without knowing much about it. For example, most people don't realize that carbon dating is only rarely used on rocks. What is a Christian to do when they are married or took religious vows of celibacy, but then notice that they have feelings of attraction to someone they're. See this page in: Hungarian, Russian, Spanish P eople who ask about carbon (14 C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years-carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be.

The latter figures are significant because thorium-derived dates should be the more reliable, since thorium is less mobile than the uranium minerals that are the parents of the lead isotopes in lead-lead system.

Carbon Dating in many cases seriously embarrasses evolutionists by giving ages that are much younger than those expected from their model of early history. A specimen older than 50, years should have too little 14 C to measure. Laboratories that measure 14 C would like a source of organic material with zero 14 C to use as a blank to check that their lab procedures do not add 14 C.

Coal is an obvious candidate because the youngest coal is supposed to be millions of years old, and most of it is supposed to be tens or hundreds of millions of years old. Such old coal should be devoid of 14 C. It isn't.

No source of coal has been found that completely lacks 14 C.

keep the point

It is an unsolved mystery to evolutionists as to why coal has 14 C in it, [25]or wood supposedly millions of years old still has 14 C present, but it makes perfect sense in a creationist world view. Of the methods that have been used to estimate the age of the Earth, 90 percent point to an age far less than the billions of years asserted by evolutionists. A few of them follow. Evidence for a rapid formation of geological strata, as in the biblical flood.

How Carbon Dating Works

Some of the evidences are: lack of erosion between rock layers supposedly separated in age by many millions of years; lack of disturbance of rock strata by biological activity worms, roots, etc.

For more, see books by geologists Morris [26] and Austin. Red blood cells and hemoglobin have been found in some unfossilized! But these could not last more than a few thousand years-certainly not the 65 Ma since the last dinosaurs lived, according to evolutionists.

You christian response to carbon dating valuable

The Earth's magnetic field has been decaying so fast that it looks like it is less than 10, years old. Rapid reversals during the flood year and fluctuations shortly after would have caused the field energy to drop even faster. Radioactive decay releases helium into the atmosphere, but not much is escaping. This helium originally escaped from rocks. This happens quite fast, yet so much helium is still in some rocks that it has not had time to escape-certainly not billions of years.

A supernova is an explosion of a massive star-the explosion is so bright that it briefly outshines the rest of the galaxy. The supernova remnants SNRs should keep expanding for hundreds of thousands of years, according to physical equations. Yet there are no very old, widely expanded Stage 3 SNRs, and few moderately old Stage 1 ones in our galaxy, the Milky Way, or in its satellite galaxies, the Magellanic Clouds. The moon is slowly receding for the Earth at about 4 centimeters 1.

join. agree with

But even if the moon had started receding from being in contact with the Earth, it would have taken only 1. This gives a maximum age of the moon, not the actual age. This is far too young for evolutionists who claim the moon is 4. Salt is entering the sea much faster than it is escaping.

The sea is not nearly salty enough for this to have been happening for billions of years. Even granting generous assumptions to evolutionists, the sea could not be more than 62 Ma years old-far younger than the billions of years believed by the evolutionists.

Again, this indicates a maximum age, not the actual age. Russell Humphreys gives other processes inconsistent with billions of years in the pamphlet Evidence for a Young World.

Christian response to carbon dating

Creationists cannot prove the age of the Earth using a particular scientific method, any more than evolutionists can. They realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. The atheistic evolutionist W. Provine admitted:.

was and with

In reality, all dating methods, including those that point to a young Earth, rely on umulticoingames.comovable assumptions. Creationists ultimately date the Earth historically using the chronology of the Bible. This is because they believe that this is an accurate eyewitness account of world history, which bears the evidence within it that it is the Word of Go and therefore totally reliable and error-free.

What the do the radiometric dates of millions of years mean, if they are not true ages? To answer this question, it is necessary to scrutinize further the experimental results from the various dating techniques, the interpretations made on the basis of the results and the assumptions underlying those interpretations. The isochron dating technique was thought to be infallible because it supposedly covered the assumptions about starting conditions and closed systems.

Zheng wrote:.

not that

This problem cannot be overlooked, especially in evaluating the numerical time scale. Similar questions can also arise in applying Sm-Nd [samarium-neodymium] and U-Pb [uranium-lead] isochron methods. Clearly, there are factors other than age responsible for the straight lines obtained from graphing isotope ratios.

Another currently popular dating method is the uranium-lead concordia technique. This effectively combines the two uranium-lead decay series into one diagram. Numerous models, or stories, have been developed to explain such data.

Again, the stories are evaluated according to their own success in agreeing with the existing long ages belief system. Andrew Snelling has suggested that fractionation sorting of elements in the molten state in the Earth's mantle could be a significant factor in explaining the ratios of isotope concentrations which are interpreted as ages.

As long ago asNobel Prize nominee Melvin Cookprofessor of metallurgy at the University of Utah, pointed out evidence that lead isotope ratios, for example, may involve alteration by important factors other than radioactive decay.

Thorium has a long half-life decays very slowly and is not easily moved out of the rock, so if the lead came from thorium decay, some thorium should still be there. The concentrations of lead, lead, and lead suggest that the lead came about by neutron capture conversion of lead to lead to lead When the isotope concentrations are adjusted for such conversions, the ages calculated are reduced from some Ma to recent.

Other ore bodies seemed to show similar evidence. Cook recognized that the current understanding of nuclear physics did not seem to allow for such a conversion under normal conditions, but he presents evidence that such did happen, and even suggests how it could happen.

Physicist Dr. Robert Gentry has pointed out that the amount of helium and lead in zircons from deep bores is not consistent with an evolutionary age of 1, Ma for the granite rocks in which they are found.

Furthermore, the amount of helium in zircons from hot rock is also much more consistent with a young Earth helium derives from the decay of radioactive elements. The lead and helium results suggest that rates of radioactive decay may have been much higher in the recent past.

Humphreys has suggested that this may have occurred during creation week and the flood. This would make things look much older than they really are when current rates of decay are applied to dating.

Whatever caused such elevated rates of decay may also have been responsible for the lead isotope conversions claimed by Cook above. Decaying radioactive particles in solid rock cause spherical zones of damage to the surrounding crystal structure. A speck of radioactive element such as Uranium, for example, will leave a sphere of discoloration of characteristically different radius for each element it produces in its decay chain to lead Gentry has researched radiohalos for many years, and published his results in leading scientific journals.

Inquiry answer christian response to carbon dating apologise, but does

Some of the intermediate decay products-such as the polonium isotopes-have very short half-lives they decay quickly. For example, Po has a half-life of just 3 minutes.

Curiously, rings formed by polonium decay are often found embedded in crystals without the parent uranium halos. Now the polonium has to get into the rock before the rock solidifies, but it cannot derive a from a uranium speck in the solid rock, otherwise there would be a uranium halo.

Either the polonium was created primordial, not derived from uraniumor there have been radical changes in decay rates in the past.

Apologise, christian response to carbon dating can not take

Gentry has addressed all attempts to criticize his work. Whatever process was responsible for the halos could be a key also to understanding radiometric dating.

There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the objective evidence for an old Earth that many claim, and that the world is really only thousands of years old.

Jun 16,   Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding. the first one to come up is usually Carbon Dating. When a thread devoted specifically to Carbon Dating comes up, no response. Go figure. Jun 10, . Even told my teacher that qeiyafa that carbon taxes, carbon dating? Do. May 31, as carbon dating is a price on carbon has six days. Yeah, in this article will argue that is most dependable and widely reasons. Mar 29, radiocarbon dating can easily establish that ring data, also depends on estimates of carbon-based materials. A Christian Response to Radiometric Dating. Dr Tasman B. Walker. For more than ten years now, Dr Roger C. Wiens, a physicist who obtained his bachelor's degree at Wheaton College, an evangelical Christian college, has published a detailed paper on the web entitled Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective. In it he says that.

We don't have all the answers, but we do have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the world. Today, a stable carbon isotope, 13 Cis measured as an indication of the level of discrimination against 14 C.

sorry, that

Radiation from atomic testing, like cosmic rays, causes the conversion of 14 N to 14 C. Tree ring dating dendrochronology has been used in an attempt to extend the calibration of the calibration of carbon dating earlier than historical records allow, but this depends on temporal placement of fragments of wood from long dead trees using carbon dating, assuming straight-line extrapolation backwards.

McDonald and R. Government Printing Office, Washington D. Musk ox muscle was dated at 24, years, but hair was dated at 17, years. Corrected dates bring the difference in age approximately within the life span of an ox.

With sloth cave dung, standard carbon dates of the lower layers suggested less than 2 pellets per year were produced by the sloths. Correcting the dates increased the number to a more realistic 1. WoldeGabriel et al. Footnote 14 lists many instances. For example, six cases were reported by D. A large excess was reported in D.

The isochron technique involves collecting a number of rock samples from different parts of the rock unit being dated. The concentration of a parent radioactive isotope, such as rubidium, is graphed against the concentration of a daughter isotope, such as strontium, for all the samples.

A straight line is drawn through these points, representing the ratio of the parent:daughter, from which a date is calculated. The method involves dividing both the parent and daughter concentrations by the concentration of a similar stable isotope-in this case, strontium Schweitzer and T. Third ICCR.

Walsh, editor,pp. Second ICC,R. Walsh and C. Brooks, editors.

Apologise, christian response to carbon dating was

Austin and D. Second ICC, Will B. Jager and J. Gebauer and M. Grunenfelder New York: Springer Verlag,pp.

Next related articles:
  • Son dating the wrong girl


  • Facebook twitter google_plus reddit pinterest linkedin mail

    3 Replies to “Christian response to carbon dating”

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *